Jurgen Klopp questions Chelsea's VAR goal: 'I don’t think I have the Liverpool glasses on my nose' - New Gersy

Header Ads

Jurgen Klopp questions Chelsea's VAR goal: 'I don’t think I have the Liverpool glasses on my nose'





Liverpool FC via Getty Images



Jurgen Klopp questioned the VAR-aided decision to award a Chelsea equalizer after Liverpool were dumped out of the League Cup third round courtesy of a 2-1 defeat.

Having crystal rectifier because of associate athletic Daniel Sturridge strike, the Reds were pegged back within the 79th minute as Emerson poked home a rebound once Ross Barkley’s header from associate Eden Hazard set-piece delivery had been saved.







And the hosts’ hopes of progression were all over minutes later as Hazard snaked into the box before smashing home a superb goal create a call|to come to a decision|to make your mind up|to choose|to determine} the tie.

Speaking in his post-match group discussion, Klopp lambasted the choice to award the free-kick that crystal rectifier to Chelsea leveling associated VAR’s failure to spotlight offsides from the next delivery.

Liverpool vs Chelsea

He said: “Both [situations] discussable. I don’t suppose it’s a foul. He plays the ball so he touched subsequently, however things like that happen.

“We perpetually bit one another with feet, with arms and stuff like that. Not all of that's a foul. It’s a transparent ball and also the linesman wished to relinquish a throw.






“That’s it’s a foul so a yellow card is often strange. so true, I didn’t see it within the game, of course, however, once they started mistreatment the volt-ampere I knew it had been shut, obviously.

“It was shut, it had been very shut. I don’t suppose I actually have the urban center glasses on my nose, I'd say it’s offsides. That’s then however it's.

“You have 2 players that area unit clearly offsides and that they block. to not forget, they don’t bit the ball. They block players, my players. which means an enormous impact within the state of affairs.

“I don’t suppose you have got to travel to the ball. If you all will block once we area unit offsides that may amendment set-pieces massively, to be honest.

“Then the one, the political leader makes the header and, for me, is offsides similarly - not a lot of. however, I don’t expect that the official would see that.


(Getty Images)

“Then you have got the volt-ampere so you have got a glance and it’s shut. Why does one use it if you don’t need to create the choice then? That’s all. it had been clear.

“I don’t feel unhealthy, it had been solely unlucky. you have got a free-kick that was perhaps no free-kick. I believe in a very ton of things no one whistles it.







“And the opposite one, perhaps within the future once you use volt-ampere then you say: ‘OK, that’s offside’. I don’t expect mistreatment in things like this, the VAR, to be honest.


AP

“But if you employ it, make a decision.”

The German was seen remonstrating with Xherdan Shaqiri once the full-time whistle had blown however explained that the 2 were merely discussing the delivery of a late free-kick.

He added: “At 1-0, Shaq was fully alone within the box and perhaps you may raise him why he didn’t shoot in this state of affairs.

“I spoke a few free-kick - the last one. Mo was standing wide and an entire bunch of players was in one the direction wherever we have a tendency to shot the ball.

“If he might have competed in Moon a 1 on one state of affairs within the eleventh hour of the sport it might are not unfortunate. it had been solely concerning the place kick nothing else.”

Source: Evening Standard




Mohammad is a young Entrepreneur running a number of sites from his living room. He is an experienced SEO Consultant, Computer Engineer, Professional Blogger & an addicted Web Developer

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.